Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration" Results 461 - 480 of 1,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 8:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
§ 1302(a) (emphasis added), or "necessary to carry out the administration of the insurance programs under" the Medicare subchapter of the Social Security Act, id. [read post]
Cooperate or litigate This will add to the ongoing “cooperate v. litigate” debate in data protection and privacy matters. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
The defendant didn’t consider the fact that the Social Security Administration had determined that she is disabled; 3. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
The defendant didn’t consider the fact that the Social Security Administration had determined that she is disabled; 3. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Kate Beattie
The changes were made by the Social Security (Hospital Inpatients) Regulations 2005. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
The security officers are alert, but do not seem especially tense. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am by Melanie Fontes
  They advised Secretary Ross that estimates based on administrative sources already found in legal documents—such as Social Security Administration records—“better me[t] DOJ’s [VRA-related] uses” could be used without “harm[ing] the quality of the census count. [read post]
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:01 am by PaulKostro
Simply because the Social Security Administration has determined that a person is disabled does not necessarily mean that the person is incapable of performing everyday tasks. [read post]
Average monthly Social Security retirement payment: $1,306 a month for individuals and $2,140 for couples Maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security taxation: $116,500. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:42 pm
After searching for a job in California and North Carolina, having already exhausted her unemployment benefits, retirement savings and 401(k) account, Keaney decided to elect to receive social security early at the minimum required age of 62 years old. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm by Mary Dwyer
    Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 It wants to take corrective steps to mitigate any fines ICE might impose. #2:  An employer receives a Social Security Administration letter (a no-match notice) announcing that the  employer's payroll tax contributions tied to particular employees' social security numbers (SSNs) contain information that conflicts with the SSA's own records associated with the earmarked SSNs. [read post]