Search for: "Rhodes v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2013, 2:52 am
There is no clear law to apply to such questions – interstate disputes are governed by federal common law – and Rhode Island v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
III § 11 Rhode Island Art. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Ruling on an issue of first impression for the state’s high court on Friday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
While Judge Ramos' ruling breaks little new ground, it is significant because it applies to a case brought by seven states (New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington state and Virginia), and New York City. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Compare this level of state participation with, for example, the amicus brief filed by all forty-nine other states in Maryland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Kulik v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:09 pm
See Barker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:51 am
Rhodes, the patents-in-suit passed as part of his estate to his wife, Brenda Rhodes. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am
New York State, which supports the Tailoring Rule, has been joined in the motion to intervene by California, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
In Rhode Island v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:06 am
Article V required a call when two-thirds of the states applied for (demanded) it. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
M.W. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, CRV Enterprises v United States No 10-1151 // [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am
States were never intended to tax international income, and doing so raises serious constitutional issues in many states. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
From Montaquila v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
