Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2012, 11:47 pm
Related posts: Franzina on Negrepontis v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:17 pm
As Naomi Roht-Arriaza points out in her fascinating post on the subject, this particular case of South Africa v Zimbabwe illustrates the strain put on governments by the principle of complementarity under the 1998 Rome Statute, which puts pressure on implicated states to investigate these major crimes on their threshold, too close to home. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:00 am
So ordered the High Court of South Africa Tuesday, in its judgment in South African Litigation Centre and Zimbabwe Exiles Forum v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am
In this decision the court of Rome states that, in accordance with the e-Commerce directive (implemented by leg. decree 70/2003), the Enforcement directive (implemented by leg. decree 140/2006), and the ECJ decision C-70/10 of November 2011, a hosting provider cannot be held liable for the hosted content. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:02 am
In fact, stakes for non-Member States are higher in Brussels I than in Rome I or II. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:00 am
Originally published in Italian (2007), the book has been translated to English by Thomas V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am
case, as well as in the negotiations that resulted in its inclusion as article 7 of the Rome Statute for the ICC, crimes against humanity enhance international humanitarian law’s effectiveness by criminalizing widespread or systematic attacks upon civilians even prior to the onset of armed conflict. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm
Related posts: The Making of European Private Law: Regulation and Governance Design Conference: «The New European Contract Law: From the Rome Convention to the “Rome I” Regulation» Party Autonomy and Private Law-Making in Private International Law: The Lex Mercatoria that Isn’t [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm
The case is Coleman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
., of Blank Rome LLP The Supreme Court on April 18, 2012, held in Kappos v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
., of Blank Rome LLP The Supreme Court on April 18, 2012, held in Kappos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
Even scientists who have highlighted safety issues publicly state that safe raw milk is possible, and do not dare advocate the only protective solution: ban sales of raw milk, especially through vending devices. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:19 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am
Medical malpractice : a how to guide Toronto, Ont. : Ontario Bar Association, 2012 KF 2905.3 A75 O58 2012 Medical malpractice : a how to guide Toronto, Ont. : Ontario Bar Association, 2012 1 v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
” [Note: the Mediaset Complainant commenced a civil action in Rome and the court reportedly restored the domain name to it, although since the registrar is in the United States it is unclear how the judgment can be enforced.] [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
In R.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
She was trial counsel for Romagoza v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
