Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 461 - 480
of 59,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm
Violation of employer’s rules results in dismissal from the positionMatter of Ward v Juettner, 63 AD3d 748The Board of Police Commissioners of the Town of Greenburgh conducted a disciplinary hearing and found Town of Greenburgh police officer Erik Ward guilty of violating "three Rules and Regulations" of the Town of Greenburgh Police Department.* The penalty imposed upon Ward: termination from his position.Ward sued in an attempt to have the court annul the… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
In Deiulemar Compagnia di Navigazione SpA v M/V Allegra, the court allowed depositions, as well as access to documentary and physical evidence in such a circumstance. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:17 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 9:34 am
A notice on subscription-only service Lawtel drew the IPKat's attention to C & J Clark International Ltd v Four Star Distribution, a ruling by Appointed Person Ruth Annand on 20 December 2006 against a UK Trade Mark Registry decision.Four Star applied for invalidation of Clark's CICA trade marks for footwear in Class 25, citing a likelihood of confusion with its own earlier CIRCA registered trade mark for clothing in Class 25. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
Alabama Rule of Evidence 704 provides that Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is to be excluded if it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
Back in January, I posted an entry that raised a hypothetical question about the interplay between Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) and Federal Rule of Evidence 803(10). [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
In Pattillo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:58 am
Recently, in Elliot v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
In Autosurvey Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:55 am
Ohio Supreme Court ruling grants discretion to trial court judges in applying post-conviction DNA testing law: Ohio Supreme Court's 6-1 ruling yesterday in the non-capital case of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 415(a) provides that (a) In a civil case in which a claim for damages or other relief is predicated on a party's alleged commission of conduct constituting an offense of sexual assault or child molestation, evidence... [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:36 pm
In New York Republican State Committee v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
The Court concluded that there was nothing in section 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 that could “properly be regarded as weakening in any way the force of the rule in Bonnard v Perryman”. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:07 am
Disciplinary rulings and penalty recommendations issued by New York City OATH administrative law judges[Click on case citation to read the full text of the ruling]Asking for a kiss found to be unprofessional conductDep't of Housing Preservation & Development v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
”) [2] Daubert v. [read post]
