Search for: "Russell v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-939Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
Commonwealth of Australia which quoted extensively from three United States Supreme Court cases that examined similar issues, reports Evan Criddle of PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
United States, the legal challenge to Arizona immigration bill S.B. 1070. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
On Monday, the Justices announced that they would review United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as co-counsel to the petitioners in City of Arlington v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-282Issue: Whether conspiracy to commit a robbery, absent any overt act in furtherance of the crime, is itself a violent felony presenting a serious potential risk of physical injury justifying an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:37 am by Russell Knight
If you signed an Affidavit of Support in order to bring your foreign spouse to the United States, you may hav [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 6-2 yesterday that in a case involving deferred restitution, a defendant must file a notice of appeal from the restitution order in order to challenge it. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
United States, scheduled for consideration at today’s Conference. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 11:53 am by Russell Knight
United States, 315 US 60 – Supreme Court 1942 In civil cases like divorce, that rule of an absolute right to an attorney does not apply. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]