Search for: "S. L. K., individually" Results 461 - 480 of 1,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In many countries, especially those with legal systems based on Roman law, this is the exclusive method by which individuals can acquire citizenship at birth. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
If the question of the precise [moment of] receipt were decisive, it would be necessary to accede to the appellant’s motion to take evidence by consulting the original file and to pursue the investigations.[4] However, the Board is of the opinion that the question as to when precisely the individual documents were received is not decisive. [read post]
In the SEC’s press release, the San Francisco Regional Office Director, Jina L. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KF282 .T73 2014Susan Bryant, Elliott S. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm by Chris Carey
Chris Carey, editor of Sharesleuth.com, does not invest in individual stocks and has no position in any of the companies mentioned, nor does Justin McLachlan, co-author of this story.) [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the Attorney General’s view, the fact that ULC offers “instant ordination” to anyone who completes the form—without requiring individuals to “earn” minister credentials—is incompatible with the state’s definition of ordination. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:04 pm by rstokes
F., Voysey, M., Askie, L., Duley, L., Pryde, P. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In today’s blog post, we share some interesting Question and Answer responses recently provided by the Department of State’s Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Consular Affairs (L/CA), in a meeting with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:19 pm by Zoe Tillman
Barnes & Noble was represented by Davis Wright Tremaine, and Amazon.com was represented by K&L Gates. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:15 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Revenue Procedure 2015-6, section 10, states: “An employer maintaining a multiple employer plan can rely on a favorable determination letter issued for the plan except with respect to the requirements of §§ 401(a)(4), 401(a)(26), 401(l), 410(b) and 414(s), and, if the employer maintains or has ever maintained another plan, §§ 415 and 416. [read post]