Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 461 - 480
of 62,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Cependant, ils pouvaient s’exprimer au sujet de faits et événements objectifs qui s’étaient produits pendant les délibérations, en partie parce que d’autres Jurés pouvaient potentiellement confirmer ou infirmer ces assertions. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
S., at 30– 31; see Alden v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWCA Civ 739; [2012] WLR (D) 168 “In the context of determining whether to disqualify a company director for misconduct in the direction of an insolvent company the use of the expression ‘exceptional circumstances’ was better avoided. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’… [read post]
26 May 2021, 11:48 am
Susan Spath Hegedus, Inc., v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 6:16 am
Nichols (D. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 6:16 am
Nichols (D. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:54 am
In Soulier v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:48 am
Regina (Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2010] EWHC 852(Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 102 “The duty of fairness which arose in respect of an Ofsted inspection carried out pursuant to s 20 of the Children Act 2004 was derived from a duty to carry out a bona fide and open-minded inspection into the operation of local authority departments and systems of safeguarding and not to inspect individuals. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
The first decision, Solera Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
S. 797, 803-806 (1985). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
Cartwright and another v Registrar of Companies: [2012] EWHC 359 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 48 “Where a company’s administrators sent notice to the registrar of companies to place the company into voluntary liquidation, and the notice was sent and received by the registrar before the termination of the administration, but the administrative steps to bring about that registration occurred after the end of administration, paragraph 83(4) of… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
Barber v Croydon London Borough Council – WLR Daily [2010] EWCA Civ 51; [2010] WLR (D) 39 “A local housing authority had acted unreasonably in seeking possession against a mentally impaired tenant for anti-social behaviour when it failed to take into account the possibility that the tenant’s mental impairment might have given rise to his behaviour. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
City of London v Samede and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 160; [2012] WLR (D) 41 “While it could be appropriate for the court to take into account the general character of the views whose expression the Convention on Human Rights was being invoked to protect, namely the article 10 (freedom of expression) and article 11 (freedom of assembly) rights of demonstrators on the public highway, it was very difficult to see how those rights could ever prevail… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:15 am
"[W]e determine that Attorney LeSieur's conduct demonstrates a pattern of disregard for the requirements of the law and calls for the imposition of public discipline. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
"With respect to the level of discipline, we wholeheartedly agree with the referee's comment that Attorney Elliott is not fit to be licensed as a lawyer in the state of Wisconsin. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:46 am
Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner and others [2008] EWHC 1084 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 155 “The obligation to provide information for disclosure pursuant to s 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 was distinct from and not limited by the obligation to provide information for disclosure in a publication scheme pursuant to s 19 of that Act. [read post]
