Search for: "SAID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 461 - 480 of 2,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm by WIMS
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and No.… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm by Hyemin Han
” This is all the court said in defense of applying Zauderer. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am by Elina Saxena
Wells  also  linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
The government’s recommendation in Bank of America v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Singer
In the past year, several Federal Circuit decisions defined situations in which software inventions could be eligible for patenting in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:54 am
" The ruling affirms an injunction entered by the district court in May 2007, enjoining future planting of Monsanto alfalfa, called "Roundup Ready alfalfa," pending the preparation by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), of an environmental impact statement (EIS). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jeff Lorenzo
So says the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. [read post]