Search for: "SIMMONS v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Simmons, noting that a majority of the states did not permit execution of persons who’d been juveniles when they’d committed the crime. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
Simmons-Harris dissent – to “protect[t] the Nation’s social fabric from religious conflict. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:13 pm
Meade, arguing for respondent Simmons, went first. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
As we have noted before, the definition of director independence under state law does not take into account the fees paid for serving on the board. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm by mjpetro
Simmons, 560 F.3d 98, 108 (2d Cir. 2009) (refusal to remove hands from pocket); United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
Simmons, twenty states had allowed the execution of murderers who committed their crimes before the age of 18. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The State appealed, but in the interim State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 11:43 pm
Simmons and the issue of adolescent decision-making competence. 52 Wayne L. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:30 am by Tim Zinnecker
App. 1994) (“filed financial statements”); Simmons Oil Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]