Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C." Results 461 - 480 of 27,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2011, 6:29 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Here's the question: Delaware General Corporation Law sections 141( c )(1) and (2) state: “The board of directors may . . . designate 1 or more committees, each committee to consist of 1 or more directors of the corporation. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
In other words, a home owned in a tenancy by the entirety by two elderly spouses gets up to $1 million of equity in protection for a declared homestead ($500,000 x 2), because each person can claim up to $500,000.00 in their separate property interest, and "stack" the homesteads to claim an aggregate exemption of $1 million together (M.G.L.. c. 188, §§1 & 2). [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:12 am
Kent at C&C has this long post providing lots of helpful context for the Beard v . [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
Finally, the Court handed down two decisions of interest in connection with jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:55 am by WIMS
Groups ask support for region's interest - The interstate Great Lakes Commission joined a platform this week seeking commitment from whomever wins the election to maintain funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) that funds habitat projects, pollution cleanup and fights invasive species through grants to state and local agencies. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
  For this proposition, C&L cited one of our favorite cases:  United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:40 pm by David Fraser
An interesting debate over lawful access is playing out in the pages of the Windsor Star. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:50 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Judge C Scott Crabtree ruled that Amendment 43 [text, PDF] of Colorado's state constitution, which was passed by voters in 2006 and defines marriage as being between one man and one woman, "bears no rational relationship to any conceivable government interest. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:42 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
The new C&DIs are summarized below (you’ll note that there are a lot of bullet points but really only five C&DIs related to Rule 506 were released): When does a shareholder become a beneficial owner … The bad actor disqualification determination must be made at the time of each sale of securities. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Kevin Johnson
Johnson, Dean of the UC Davis School of Law and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am by Jon Gelman
Pursuant to section 503(d)(1) of the 1974 Act, I have received the advice of the United States International Trade Commission on whether any industry in the United States is likely to be adversely affected by waivers of the competitive need limitations provided in section 503(c)(2), and I have determined, based on that advice and on the considerations described in sections 501 and 502(c) of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2462(c)) and after giving great weight to… [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
The evidence established that Kate Middleton, as a member of the British Royal Family, was the subject of great public interest in the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 4:34 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Back in February we reported on the Opinion presented by Advocate General Tanchev in case C-249/19, JE. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:44 am
Of course not.As Tom explained in his post a couple of days ago, today the CJEU was expected to decide yet another case in this area: Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment, a reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly hyperlinking-loving Member State, Sweden [if you missed what happened in this country following Svensson, you can read it all here]. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:11 am by Michael Geist
The Liberal release on Bill C-11, the new copyright bill, includes the following comments from MP Scott Simms: “Recent disclosures of diplomatic cables show that parts of the Conservative copyright plan were drafted to satisfy industry in the United States rather than the best interests of Canadians. [read post]