Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF I. C. Vs." Results 461 - 480 of 637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
In short, perjury cannot be proven simply by showing the testimony of a witness is inconsistent with the statements of another witness, as the Republicans seek to do with the Goodlatte/Chaffetz letter, and with their video clips of Clinton vs. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
I have a lot of respect for public interest/cause lawyers who spend a lot of time -- yes, all their professional lives -- crafting a long-term litigation/legislation strategy to get from point A to point B. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
After an average 12-year follow-up period, no differences were observed in the rates of sexual (21.1% vs 21.8%), violent (42.9% vs. 44.5%) or general (any) recidivism (56.6% vs 60.4%) for treated and untreated groups, respectively. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman The European Court of Justice issued its long-anticipated decision in the three Google AdWords cases (C-236/08, C-237-08 and C-238/08) referred to it by the French Cour de Cassation. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am by Karwan Eskerie
What social evil or corrosion of the rule of law that state of affairs engenders is an interesting issue to ponder, but was not one which this judgment could or did answer. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
Bill C-59’s changes include tighter merger controls, revised marketing rules, and greater potential for consumer lawsuits alleging anti-competitive behaviour. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
Bill C-59’s changes include tighter merger controls, revised marketing rules, and greater potential for consumer lawsuits alleging anti-competitive behaviour. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
I say “guidance”, because it was so unclear some commentators reported the decision as a win for Nestle, while others reported it as a win for Cadbury. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by azatty
I also had to think hard about how we could make this interesting for a diverse group of people. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
A detailed observation of Madras High Court in W.P.Nos.23850 & 27432 of 2010, between Indian Bank Adyar Branch Vs. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 6:55 am by Don Asher
Among federal safety regulations to protect against amputations are: 29 CFR Part 1910 Subparts O and P (machinery and machine guarding); 29 CFR 1926 Subpart I (hand tools and power tools); 29 CFR Part 1928 Subpart D; 29 CFR Part 1915 Subparts C, H, and J; and 29 CFR Part 1917 Subparts B, C, and G. [read post]