Search for: "STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT" Results 461 - 480 of 1,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
He took Ubers not only in the Nutmeg State but also in New York City. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:59 am by Terry Hart
Warfel (New York: Literary Publishers, 1953), 1-4. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee started working for HUD as a criminal investigator in 1998, and transferred to Hartford, Connecticut, in 2000 to be closer to his wife, who was in Albany, New York. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Vitale (1962), ending prayer in schools; and New York Times v. [read post]
By arguing that Title VII permits employers to discriminate against employees because they love or enter sexual relationships with people of the same sex, the Department of Justice broke with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the attorneys general of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and dozens of major corporations.As we argue, here, the DOJ’s position in Zarda is not only morally repugnant but also analytically weak. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm by Amy J. Traub and Saima Sheikh
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm by Amy J. Traub and Saima Sheikh
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:34 am by Jennifer Mersing
In addition, a New York court is also weighing similar challenges to New York’s nuclear subsidy program. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
When the United States and the state of New York refused to intervene, she amended her complaint by dropping the qui tam action and by substituting retaliation claims under both the FCA and the NYFCA. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In a total of 27 states, including California (2013, 2010), New York (2015), Pennsylvania (2017) and Virginia (2015), statewide policies have been passed regulating the use of criminal history in state-employment job applications. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In a total of 27 states, including California (2013, 2010), New York (2015), Pennsylvania (2017) and Virginia (2015), statewide policies have been passed regulating the use of criminal history in state-employment job applications. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In a total of 27 states, including California (2013, 2010), New York (2015), Pennsylvania (2017) and Virginia (2015), statewide policies have been passed regulating the use of criminal history in state-employment job applications. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
Per recent reports, in the third quarter of 2011, about 60,000 new variants of ransomware were detected. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The legal team for the New York Times in their case against Sarah Palin have argued that the former governor of Alaska cannot establish malice in her defamation claim against the paper. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
New York (17 Apr 1905) ―Lochner, a baker from New York, was convicted of violating the New York Bakeshop Act, which prohibited bakers from working more than 10 hours a day and 60 hours a week. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:09 am by Jennifer Mersing
As Illinois and New York federal courts are currently considering challenges to state nuclear subsidiaries based in part on the precedent in Hughes v. [read post]