Search for: "STATE v HILL"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
There are two commentaries on the 2022 edition: Professor Mark Hill, “Principles of Canon Law and the Mind of the Anglican Communion” 26 July 2022 and Andrew Goddard. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The divided vote, which broke down on partisan lines, stands in stark contrast to recent bipartisan efforts on Capitol Hill, particularly on the comprehensive American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:32 pm
DMK Holding, LLC v City of Baldwin, 646 SW 3d 708 (MO App. 6/7/2022) [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Charles and Angie Muhammad v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Valdez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am
[With thanks to Daniel Hill.] [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:50 pm
§1658(a)s catch-all-limitations period.MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” City of Olathe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
In the 2013 report from the Justice Department inspector general, investigators said they did “not believe” Joseph V. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
Brad Dress reports for The Hill. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
” (citing Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Hard Candy, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:30 pm
Steven Lubet on the Supreme Court’s selective history (The Hill). [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:00 am
In Newberry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:52 pm
On July 13, 2022, the California Supreme Court denied numerous depublication requests with respect to, and declined to review on its own motion, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
