Search for: "STATE v WATERS"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 7:00 am
The tribe asserted that the water belonged to the United States in trust for the tribe. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:03 pm
The Court stated that the DEP was not called upon to interpret the statutory exemption from water charges afforded religious corporations "in th[e] context" of Real Property Tax Law § 420-a(1). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
The Appeals Court said, "Pursuant to the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Norton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm
Bullitt (collectively, the Conservancy) allege that the United States is improperly diverting water from Icicle Creek to the Leavenworth National Fish Hatchery (the Hatchery) and otherwise violating Washington State law. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:51 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) and Rapanos v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:18 pm
Desert Water Agency v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
In Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:24 pm
A summary of the case is described in Intermediate Court of Appeals Creates Public Trust Evaluation Criteria for All Boards and Commissions.The Hawaii Supreme Court took up the matter and issued its opinion in Kauai Springs v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm
The post United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
A couple of months ago, I was asked to work on an amicus brief focusing on the treaties made between the Navajo Nation and the United States with a couple of other people. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
By Diane Kindermann and Jessica Melms Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
State of Montana. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:31 am
This case focused on one question: “whether there was a 19th-century basis for an easement providing the public with the right to touch privately owned streambeds underlying state waters. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
The district court in this case refused to approve a proposed settlement of a Clean Water Act suit brought by the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky against the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:00 pm
Haas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 6:03 am
While the headlines from the Flint water crisis have all but subsided, two consolidated putative class actions arising from the crisis gained new life over the summer as a result of the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Boler v. [read post]
