Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 461 - 480
of 907
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
” Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
” At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen also focuses on the questions drafted by the Court and suggests that the second question is “the nagging one. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
The judge states that “What is concerning about this case is that the continued litigation is proving to cause stress, anxiety, upset and confusion to B. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:16 pm
EEOC , No. 13-1019 (U.S.) with keen interest. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
Then came a helpful explanation by guest contributor Christian Schalk as to why both companies should be so keen on retaining their right to use the name. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
Lisa Keen of the Keen News Services reviews the state of play for challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, as well as how the Court might rule on those challenges. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
In the Secretary of State’s view, qualification criteria form part of an allocation scheme. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The Associated Press v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
’s explanation for the coding of Wisconsin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am
Background The Supreme Court has a keen fascination these days with patent cases, and it is often quite skeptical of the work of the specialized court that reviews that kind of case, the U.S. [read post]
