Search for: "STATE v. MELENDEZ"
Results 461 - 479
of 479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Michigan law prof Richard Friedman summarizes the Melendez-Diaz case, and gives links to the particulars: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Different states have different practices, but in Texas (and 10 other states) DNA swabs are taken upon arrest and entered into the system. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:38 pm
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:58 pm
"The reliability of crime labs has been questioned in several states... [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
Several cases present questions concerning criminal law: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (Fox) Brief in opposition (NBC) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-591 Case name: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:44 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
Supreme Court on 14 March 2008.Docket: 07-591Case name: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-591 Case name: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:54 pm
I have previously written about the pending cert petition in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:52 pm
February 7 - State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
[The Court granted cert; see subsequent posts.]The second case is Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
On October 26, 2007, Luis Melendez-Diaz filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking for the United States Supreme Court to resolve this issue. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:26 pm
The petition in Melendez-Dias v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 4:52 pm
Id. at 45.As noted by Justice Souter in his dissenting opinion in Kansas v. [read post]
