Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2022, 5:42 pm by Ronald Mann
Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Court decision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
 This wasn't some backwater state prosecution with intoxicated lawyers doing a half-assed job just to make a buck. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:00 am by Venkat
Johnson County CCSending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
  That's not, in fact, what the conditions say.How could the state get around this? [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Human Cells and the Strange Effects of Property & Intellectual Property Law by Robin Feldman (U.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
 This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(Strangely, Womack is also listed as concurring with the dissent, but he's not listed among the judges signing onto the actual dissent.) [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:44 am
" You're getting sentenced to death.But isn't it a somewhat strange system that allows -- indeed, arguably compels -- such a facile result? [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
I'll be surprised if this one survives.Yes, it's strange. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case is an exception, one of the few immunity cases in the Supreme Court that do not favor the police.The case is Sause v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:44 am
An in-depth analysis of the decision, Kulstad v. [read post]