Search for: "SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION 13" Results 461 - 480 of 976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
  It also contains a detailed discussion of the core preemption decisions – albeit slightly skewed in our opinion. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Jon Sands
Today's three opinions all address issues that can arise in child-pornography cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am by Ryan Scoville
As a supplement to prior writing on this issue, consider the following, which reflects an analysis of citation data collected from all reported federal judicial opinions that have analyzed CIL since the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:11 pm by Jack Goldsmith
 In the future the CIA will seek opinions from OLC less often and will invariably supplement legal advice from OLC with a political risk assessment. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:16 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The BBC reports on the death of a 13 year old Palestinian boy, who was killed by Israeli fire during clashes at Rachel’s Tomb. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:51 am
 (For example, here's the Fox News version of the story.)The next time one of your friends mentions this case, you can supplement this discussion with a note that the case has at this point been dismissed as moot. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The parties had proposed to settle the case based on the defendants’ agreement to supplement the deal disclosures, some changes to the break-up fee, and other procedural deal terms, as well as the defendants’ agreement to pay the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:05 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
IntroductionIrrevocabilityPayments of Premium; Crummy Powers Limiting Right of WithdrawalTrusteesAdministration of the Trust; Taxes; Fees Spendthrift ProvisionsExecution of TrustPost-ExecutionAttachments Sample Client MemoSample Last-to-Die TrustSample Living Will With POA for Health Care Sample Irrevocable TrustSample Revocable Living TrustSample Supplemental Needs TrustSample Affidavit of Trustee Appointment About the Panelists...Kenneth A. [read post]