Search for: "Sales v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 8,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am by Kevin Tottis
Supreme Court Punts on Costco First Sale Copyright CaseUnited States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
United States, the Federal Circuit held that a pharmaceutical manufactured in the United States qualified for sale, under the TAA, to the Department of Veterans Affairs even though the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) came from a non-designated country, India. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:09 am by Keith Reinfeld
This issue will likely have to decided by the United States Supreme Court due to the split in authority among circuit courts. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:49 am by Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.
United States Supreme Court decisions that deal with constitutional issues apply to every state. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:29 am by Cheryl Beise
Barker Boatworks, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-11176, 07 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by R. David Donoghue
As an initial matter, defendants’ alleged infringement, at least as pled, was done within the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am by Jay McDaniel
Under 17 USC 602 (a)(1), the importation in the United States of copies of a copyrighted that was acquired outside of the United States is an infringement of the copyright owner’s exclusive right to distribute the work. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jul. 16, 2007), the Court of Appeal had this to say: Pursuant to Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:44 pm
§ 271(f)(2) because the accused product, although manufactured outside the United States, incorporates components that are especially designed for the accused products and supplied from the United States. [read post]