Search for: "Sales v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 8,897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
  Sales of units in multi-unit projects needed to raise funds for completion may cease. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm by Michael Lowe
” This proposed new state criminal statute was introduced earlier this year by State Senator Joan Huffman with the following statement: “Since the beginning of Operation Lone Star, the Texas Department of Public Safety has seized over 353 million lethal doses of fentanyl which is enough to kill nearly every person in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:34 am by zola.support.team
According to a study conducted by Georgetown University, more than 66% of adults in the United States use prescription drugs regularly. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
The damages award was based in large part on sales Abitron made in Europe and not in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
The damages award was based in large part on sales Abitron made in Europe and not in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
  As Abitron wrote in it its brief: these “were sales in foreign countries, by foreign sellers, to foreign customers, for use in foreign countries, that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to Abitron’s foreign sales, “including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to Abitron’s foreign sales, “including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Rebecca Bratspies
  Few New Yorkers have even heard of the Macomb family, or the outsized role they played in New York and United States history. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald Mann
Jack Daniel’s relies in particular on a Supreme Court decision that allowed the United States Olympic Committee to enjoin the “Gay Olympics” even without proof of confusion. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Anuja Chowdhury
Frozen have sufficient contacts with the United States to satisfy that standard. [read post]