Search for: "Sams v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
If state law says that a given relationship qualifies as a marriage, that's good enough for Uncle Sam! [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
Guy Chazan, Sam Fleming and David Sheppard report for the Financial Times. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:40 am by Rumpole
UPDATE: Please be advised that the East Coast of the United States, north of Atlanta, to the Canadian boarder is CLOSED until further notice. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Stephen E. Sachs
But courts shouldn't permit suits against people who aren't legally liable in them, just because it solves someone else's legal problems. * * * United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  The settlements were announced at a hearing alongside claims by actors Roxanne Pallett, Antony Cotton, Mark and Samantha Womack, Caroline Quentin and her husband Sam Farmer. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:31 am by John Elwood
§ 1346(a)(1), which gives district courts jurisdiction over “[a]ny civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously . . . assessed or collected. [read post]