Search for: "Samsung" Results 461 - 480 of 6,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung has attached to its motion a copy of the brief it wishes to file (this post continues below the document): 14-07-03 Samsung's Proposed Supplemental Brief Re. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
The document doesn't state any reasons: 15-11-19 CAFC Denial of Samsung v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:13 am by Florian Mueller
So Apple believes Samsung can't claim now that this is new in any way.Apple also says Samsung's non-infringement arguments are wrong. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
The Order gives Samsung until January 1, 2021 to file any opposition to the continuation of the temporary restraining order, and gives Ericsson until January 5, 2021 to respond if, or more likely when, Samsung, files an objection. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:15 am by Mark Summerfield
  (See, e.g., coverage by The Verge, Apple licensed iOS scrolling patent to Nokia and IBM, offered license to Samsung.) [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm by Florian Mueller
That's why Samsung would not be able to make this same argument in a U.S. court. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:31 pm by Charon QC
Samsung, for its part, has alleged that Apple copied elements of Samsung’s 3G technology and utility functions such as emailing and multitasking. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:31 pm by Charon QC
Samsung, for its part, has alleged that Apple copied elements of Samsung’s 3G technology and utility functions such as emailing and multitasking. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:38 am
" Apple's massive patent case against Samsung and Samsung's own counterclaims have drawn widespread public attention, in large part due to the $1 billion verdict a jury in the California court handed down in August against Samsung. [read post]
26 May 2019, 9:00 pm
Fiat Chrysler’s new partnership with Google and Samsung is a prime example. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:30 am
The Los Angeles Times noted:In a notice posted on its Web site today, the ITC said unlicensed Sharp LCD devices, including display panels and modules, and LCD televisions made overseas that use Samsung's patented invention should be banned from the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn & Steve Brachmann
It is no great surprise that once again robots are seen as a recurring theme in the Samsung portfolio... [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:55 pm by Joe Mullin
But during a lengthy cross-examination, Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven focused on small differences between Apple's design patents and the accused Samsung phones. [read post]