Search for: "Samuel Anthony Alito"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from today’s ruling, in an opinion joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
Breyer, Elena Kagan, Anthony M. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
Justice O'Connor's replacement-Samuel Alito-was nominated by President George W. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
Feldman – who also argued the Sheehan case two terms ago in which Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the court noted criticism of the provocation doctrine – then began by presenting a generalized “balancing” test that appeared to gain no traction with the court. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:38 am
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the six-member majority (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, as well as Breyer himself). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:04 am
Alito, Jr. joined. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:34 am
In a decision that was joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that the court’s conclusion flows directly from the text. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
” In the same vein, Justice Samuel Alito commented to Pincus: “The Federal Circuit’s rule on this is 25 years old. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
Justice Samuel Alito raised a different concern, one based on the court’s existing doctrines: He suggested that the state’s position — that the denominator must be the two parcels together because the siblings took title subject to the pre-existing merger rule — is “completely contrary to the reasoning in” Palazzolo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:04 am
Meanwhile, Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice Samuel Alito spent some time in Southern California. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
” Justice Samuel Alito dissented from today’s ruling, in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:06 am
Justice Anthony M. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:20 am
For example, Justice Samuel Alito asked with apparent incredulity whether Wessler would defend the view that the Missouri statute “doesn’t affect the benefits that the participant receives. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
Justice Samuel Alito agreed that District 75 does not violate the Constitution, and he agreed with the court that the district court should take another look at the other 11 districts. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:08 am
A seventh member, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:03 am
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
” But Justice Samuel Alito returned the discussion to reality by highlighting that the challenging statutory issue in this case stemmed from the court’s own decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
At one point in Fisher’s argument, Justice Samuel Alito intervened to ensure that Fisher was not asking the court to overrule Chevron, prompting Fisher to state emphatically “no, no, no. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
Goldberg for petitioner (Art Lien) But Goldberg ran into resistance from justices of all ideological stripes, some of whom suggested that perhaps the ban could survive if the court interpreted it narrowly—for example, as Justice Samuel Alito posited, by reading it as limited to “core social networking sites” like Facebook or Google Plus. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Currently, Justice Samuel Alito is the only non-participant. [read post]
