Search for: "Sandra Grant" Results 461 - 480 of 843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
Must be followers of Sandra Fluke. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Wells Bennett
It is equally fundamental that the right to notice and an opportunity to be heard must be granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner,” and they must be heard by a “neutral and detached judge. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:35 am by David DePaolo
Richey, No. 2110862, 05/17/2013, Sandra Richey filed a civil suit against her employer, Office Max, alleging that she had suffered injuries to her knees in 2002 and to her shoulders in 2005, during the course of her employment.On three occasions – in June 2008, March 2010 and July 2010 – Richey requested the issuance of orders directing Office Max to provide her with medical care from the treating physician it had authorized.Trial judges granted each of her requests.In… [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am by Law Lady
MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, Appellee. 4th District.Torts -- Medical malpractice -- Proximate cause -- Action alleging negligent treatment of plaintiff's bedsore -- Error to deny defendants' motion for directed verdict on proximate cause grounds where there was no evidence that defendants' negligence more likely than not caused injury to plaintiffROBERT JEFFREY CHASKES, D.O., SANDRA SAINT-ELOI, ARNP and VOHRA HEALTH SERVICES, P.A., Appellants, vs. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am by Marissa Miller
” UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to the Chicago Tribune, in which she expressed doubts about the Court’s cert. grant in Bush v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: Court watchers continue to comment on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to the Chicago Tribune in which she expressed doubts about the Court’s cert. grant in Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marissa Miller
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost examines retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent comments expressing doubt about the Court’s cert. grant in Bush v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Thursday’s coverage of the Court continued to focus on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent comments to The Chicago Tribune, in which she expressed doubt about the Court’s grant of certiorari in Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune, in which she suggested that the Court should have denied review in Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Then the Court would either grant the second case, vacate the ruling, and send it back to the lower court to apply the newly announced rule or, perhaps, grant the second case if there are additional issues to be addressed. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recently expressed doubts on whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In an interview with the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor expressed doubts about whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:04 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
In a decision written by Chief Judge Sandra Lunch, the unanimous three-judge panel reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment and denial of class certification. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:44 am
   On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) granted the state's request for a continuance and (2) instructed the jury when it failed (a) to give a credibility instruction and (b) to inform the jury of its right to view a trial exhibit. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
   Along the course of that legal battle, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor — sitting temporarily on a lower federal court — joined in a decision against the measure. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm by Brady Sullivan
 As a representative of what small farmers might call “big agriculture,” Stenzel and other food industry representatives testifying at the hearing opposed granting exemptions to smaller competitors. [read post]