Search for: "Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant" Results 461 - 480 of 1,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2018, 4:00 pm by otmseo
A relator must file the case under seal and produce the material evidence to the government. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Someone -- the plaintiff, the reputation management company, or the lawyer -- decides to file suit against a nonexistent defendant. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 ["Negligence and strict products liability are separate and distinct bases for liability that do not automatically collapse into each other because the plaintiff might allege both when a product warning contributes to her injury"].)We likewise discount decisions from those jurisdictions that differ from California by categorically excluding from liability certain defendants (see, e.g., Huck… [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
”DOJ did not accept the invitation:  On Wednesday, it filed a joint motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ motion to unseal the Director's decision (which had already been unsealed in the district court). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Aaron Mackey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Zelo Street has a post entitled “Ken Clarke Seals Cameron’s Coffin”. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The portion of the judgment awarding the wife a 50% credit for the legal fees arising from the husband's criminal activity was affirmed.Third Department Holds Default Is Not Willful Under DRL §244 When It Arises with "A Sincere, Though Mistaken, Belief That Payments Were Not Required, Especially When That Belief Was Based Upon Advice from Counsel"           In Seale v Seale,  ‑‑‑… [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The portion of the judgment awarding the wife a 50% credit for the legal fees arising from the husband's criminal activity was affirmed.Third Department Holds Default Is Not Willful Under DRL §244 When It Arises with "A Sincere, Though Mistaken, Belief That Payments Were Not Required, Especially When That Belief Was Based Upon Advice from Counsel"           In Seale v Seale,  ‑‑‑… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendants' motion for a preliminary injunction to preclude the sales of plaintiffs' advanced energy vessel sealing instruments because defendants failed to establish irreparable harm. [read post]