Search for: "Sells v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 15,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 5:12 am
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:13 pm
In that case, the court was tasked with determining whether eBay was contributorily liable for selling counterfeit Tiffany jewelry on its website. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm
The justices added one new case to their merits docket for the term: Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 9:23 pm
S & A 786, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:04 pm
All One God Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:15 am
Don Rubin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
As far as we can gather Plaintiffs were offered a deal in which they would sell their real property to A, who would then turn around and sell it to B, at a profit. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
Of course, any state law that created this result would make uniform regulation impossible, and would impermissibly stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purpose and objectives of Congress in creating the Exchange Act's self-regulatory regime, including the portion of that regime applicable to registered clearing agencies under Section 17A.Whistler Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 8:18 am
First, citing its decision in Schwartz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
State Department as a foreign terrorist organization. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:34 am
New World IP LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
[1] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:51 am
Sell v United States, a Supreme Court case, allowed states to medicate individuals too incompetent to stand trial. [read post]
