Search for: "Settle v. State of California"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,039
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2021, 4:56 pm
In 2003, the ACLU of Northern California settled a lawsuit with the California Highway Patrol, placing a three-year moratorium on consent searches. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am
While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am
While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:11 am
” Thurston v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
California RIAs. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:53 pm
In an expansive recent ruling, the California Court of Appeal in Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 137 S. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
The trial was due to commence on Monday 7 December 2020 but settled shortly before. 5RB and The Law Society Gazette had a piece. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
California, 589 U. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Buckley v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Okularity then offered to settle the matter for $1M. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:55 am
This article is the first entry in a symposium previewing Trump v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
”27 Likewise, the United States District Court for the District of Southern California has held that facts communicated to a party by his or her counsel are not protected by the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
V. [read post]
