Search for: "Sharp v. E " Results 461 - 480 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am by Frank Cranmer
The new measures will apply to applications from those settled here to bring in their spouses, civil partners or fiancé(e)s and to spouses and civil partners already settled here who need to renew their visas. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:36 am by James Bickford
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills analyzes the implications of last week’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm by Florian Mueller
This inexcusable legal error marks the bitter and embarrassing end of an era.I'm 100% against smoking, so the mere thought of cigarettes almost makes me want to puke, and if it were up to me, tobacco products should be prohibited, at least the traditional ones: there appear to be some issues with e-smoking, but there is hope that at least the impact on passers-by is nowhere near as bad (at least there's less of a smell). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I particularly appreciated Breyer’s sharp observation that a court “should never be influenced by the weather of the day but inevitably . . . will be influenced by the climate of the era. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 18051(e)(1)(B) expressly provides for eligibility of lawfully present noncitizens. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
Canada (Attorney General) Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]