Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 461 - 480
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
” Within five days, however, the Justice Department, the utility district, and other parties in the case had reached the settlement, and filed for Court approval. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:51 am
The issue in the case, Virginia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
The present application brings the constitutional imperative of the rule of law into sharp focus… The Applicants are wholly successful… See Environmental Defence Canada v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
At the same time, the SEC’s Inspector General has issued a number of reports critical of the agency, and Congress intensified pressure on the SEC and Department of Justice to bring cases in the wake of the financial crisis. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
As a trial judge, she earned a reputation as a sharp and fearless jurist who does not let powerful interests bully her into departing from the rule of law. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:40 am
So I will seek somebody with a sharp and independent mind and a record of excellence and integrity. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Mills v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
(Justice Stephen G. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
Please note that Rakesh spent the past two summers working for the Department of Justice and will be working at O’Melveny & Myers this summer. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Late last month, in Gottlieb v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:12 am
OK, that happens with some frequency.But then he ignored successive court orders to release the file to incoming counsel, and Justice Howard Silver in the Bronx finally got disgusted and ordered him jailed for 30 days and fined $10,000 back in 2007.Today, the First Department Affirmed that decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
