Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 461 - 480
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
It is thus well settled, as Chief Justice Marshall explained in Wayman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
Crisp contacted two friends, Kevin Sharp and Harold Sword. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Amongst others, lovers of all things copyright levies are probably looking forward to the decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi [on which see 1709 Blog post here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from apparent copyright-loving Member State Denmark, seeking clarification as to copyright levies and their calculation, including consideration of technological protection measures [on TPMs, see the recent decision in Case… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
On December 19, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a brief order in the long-running Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
Indeed, the strain of critique that denies or rejects the importance of a sharp distinction between responsibility and duty makes it harder to critique the GP on its own terms. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:02 am
A few days before the Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
In Rodriques v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The case discussed above in the context of recusals -- Resolution Chemicals v Lundbeck -- is one which, this Kat confidently predicts, will make the pages of Scientific American, New Scientist and plenty of other journals where the bright light of patent litigation rarely penetrates. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
Today at 1:30 PM Pacific Time the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold an Apple v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:34 am
This is a sharp departure from well-established legal rules concerning causation. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
And I'm afraid that the longer this takes and the more comes to light, the more disappointed I'll probably be.Mrs. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:58 pm
” [Senior:] I don’t know how, by your lights, [the Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
But however sharp one’s forensic wits there is no escaping the essential truth that good analysis takes time. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
Observing that a car wash company and its owner “wholly ignore that the ADA prohibits discrimination against those regarded (or perceived) as being disabled,” a federal district court in Tennessee found that the owner’s letter to an employee, in which he stated that the employee was being terminated for medical reasons and that his medical needs could not be accommodated, was direct evidence of disability discrimination (Lovell v Champion Car Wash, LLC, September 3, 2013,… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
However, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Hazen Paper Co v Biggins, which sanctioned employment decisions based on factors that correlate with age only if they are analytically distinct from age, the appeals court pointed that that the comments, when viewed in a light most favorable to the employee, boiled down to one theme: the company picked the other designer because he was younger. [read post]
