Search for: "Sims v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:42 am
The documents included laptops, phones, documents, hard drives, DVDs, CDs, and SIM cards. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm
An imputation will be considered defamatory if it exposed the plaintiff to hate, contempt or ridicule (see Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press (1991) 23 NSW LR 443); tended to make the plaintiff shunned or avoided (Morgan v Lingen (1863) 8 LT 800); tended to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of others (Sim v Stretch (1936) 52 TLR 669). [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:47 am
Dorothy Sims, Florida. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Sims Vibration Laboratory Inc., et. al. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In the United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:35 am
LebanonNidaa Al Watan Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
Sims — a key part of the civil and voting rights revolution of that decade. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
Gutman also granted Plaintiff “the exclusive world-wide right and license to use her name ‘Hayley’, ‘Paige’, ‘Hayley Paige Gutman’, ‘Hayley Gutman’, ‘Hayley Paige’ or any derivative thereof ([defined] collectively [as] the ‘Designer’s Name’)” for certain purposes during the stated term of the Contract and for two years thereafter. . . . [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am
Winn & Sims, decided in June by Judge Marilyn Huff (S.D. [read post]