Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 461 - 480
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Gonzales and Toledo-Flores v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Smith, 2022 WL 228305 (N.D. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In the case of Stokes v Ragless [2017] SASC 159 Bampton J awarded general and aggravated damages of Aus$90.000 in respect of website, email and Facebook publications. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
As to the Director of Health Services, he had knowledge of the plaintiff’s condition and need for treatment by way of the plaintiff’s repeated administrative complaints. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The new rules will apply to any disclosure document that a plan administrator is required to distribute broadly to retirement plan participants and beneficiaries under ERISA. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
In determining whether the presumption should be applied, he found that the public utility presumption has been applied only to traditional public utilities such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and cable television services, where the employers provide an essential service directly to the public and are the only providers of that service. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Social Security Administration, and Flynn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
The city manager then placed the chief of police on administrative leave. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
As the general counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration correctly noted back in July 2000, “The doctrine of prosecutorial discretion applies to enforcement decisions, not benefit decisions. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Aslanian, Len. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” In 2002, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services promulgated a regulation identifying three criteria that “[a]ctuarially sound” payments must satisfy: the payment amounts must “[h]ave been developed in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles”; those amounts must be “appropriate for the populations to be covered, and the services to be furnished”; and, at issue here, the payment amounts must “[h]ave… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Bin Laden, Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Pa. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
