Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 461 - 480
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Rural Telephone Service involved competing phonebooks covering communities in what state? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
Smith (1990). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
Paul summarized Judge Leon’s opinion of Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
But not having to make copayments or pay deductibles makes the services much more affordable.) [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
He quickly distinguishes the Supreme Court’s ruling in Smith v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
” To conclude otherwise “would make the applicability of the statute depend on the commercial or administrative practices of particular communications service providers—a result that here would serve no apparent purpose of Congress. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Administrative LawFederal administrative law / by Gary Lawson.Lawson, Gary, 1958-St. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
Smith and Robert G. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Fourth, our current system of intelligence oversight generally works. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
The denial was based on the inmate's answers to three questions about Buddhism and a vegetarian diet, as well as on his record of food purchases.In Smith-Bey v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
In fact, Alan Morrison submitted an amicus brief on behalf of two former commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service, arguing that the AIA should apply. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Indeed, neither Nunez nor Smith disclosed any communications; instead the Government obtained them through the service of a search and seizure warrant on a third-party that hosted Nunez's email account. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Almost always, I file an extensive MIL within sixty days of service of an Answer. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Smith, 2011 IL App.(5th) 100048. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
TEXAS ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
During that time, he would argue another nineteen cases before the Court, including a defense of Alaska’s sex offender registration law against a challenge in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
