Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 461 - 475
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
As for purely domestic communications, they were transmitted almost entirely through wires inside the United States (and therefore covered by FISA). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:04 am
Senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm
United States, ruling 5-4 that the Fourth Amendment protects cell phone location information. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
In 2013, the United States sought to obtain certain information about a target in a criminal investigation. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:05 am
For instance, in 2018, the Supreme Court held in Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
In 2010 and 2013, it was disclosures by Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, respectively. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:35 am
Edward Snowden is actually quoted in this article as stating that he uses it all the time. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]