Search for: "Stall v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
It is interesting that at the ECHR the state appeared to represent that defeat as evidence of an anti-abortion majority in the state, particularly when only some 42% of the population turned out to vote. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am by Florian Mueller
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am by Florian Mueller
Appl... by Florian MuellerThe document indicates a blame game, with Epic insinuating that Apple is stalling and Apple pointing a finger at Epic for lack of cooperation. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by Robert A. Epstein
Reading the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division matter of Connaughton v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm by Florian Mueller
In a Q&A document accompanying its Monday announcement of a Statement of Objections (SO) against Google's Motorola's pursuit of injunctions against Apple (and creation of an agreement under allegedly-abusive circumstances) the European Commission stated in no uncertain terms its disagreement with some of the terms certain German courts have in recent years imposed on implementers of FRAND standards if they wanted to avoid sales bans under the Orange-Book-Standard framework. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  Like similar bills passed in other states, this bill includes numerous exemptions, if: (1)   The animal test is required by a federal or State regulatory authority and: (a)   the ingredient that requires an animal test is in wide use and cannot be replaced by another ingredient, (b)   a specific human health problem is associated with the ingredient and the need to conduct an animal test on the ingredient is justified and supported by a research… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:19 am
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by Ray Dowd
Breaking news here.Perhaps most significant was the US Supreme Court's decision in Golan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:44 am by Christine Dowling
  Two of those surviving nephews served as the state's key witnesses, identifying Dotson as the killer. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm by Jill L. Rosenberg
Although federal lawmaking efforts to expand Title VII protections have stalled in recent years, dozens of state and local governments have introduced and passed LGBTQ+ non-discrimination laws. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
It must be approved by the state legislature, where some are raising questions.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]