Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 9:51 am
Davidson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court at least partially retreated from a long-standing reluctance to enforce many business arbitration agreements. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
" Most discussions of standing in California v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
The fate of California’s Proposition 8, before the Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
California (373US546) vs. (9) Menominee Tribe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
cacaroot / iStock / Getty Images Plus In a 7-2 decision, the Court found the states challenging the ACA’s legality in California v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
Regents of the University of California comes from Naaz Modan at Education Dive. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
The issue for me goes back to a key standing decision, Lujan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Or California v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
” McAdams v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Three California state prisoners saw the denials of their respective § 2254 petitions at least partly reversed and remanded today, including one in a capital case.Bemore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
” The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
It's been a few years since I last woke up to a significant procedural order ("signficant" as opposed to lawyers' appearances being approved) in Oracle v. [read post]
