Search for: "State Bar v. Superior Court" Results 461 - 480 of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:08 pm
Superior Court (Turcios) and the opinion is here.SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:36 am
Following the Supreme Court’s 2012 recognition of concurrent federal and state jurisdiction over Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class actions in Mims v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:04 am
State Farm Fire and Casualty, 895 A.2d 530 (Pa. 2006).The court in Donovan also reiterated its previous decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm by Alice Woolley
 The Supreme Court held that both superior (inherent jurisdiction) and statutory courts have jurisdiction to require counsel to continue, that asking counsel about the reasons for withdrawal does not violate privilege, and requiring counsel to continue does not create an improper conflict of interest or interfere with independence of the bar. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:00 am by Beth Graham
Superior Court unconscionability rule to the arbitration clause in a consumer cell-phone contract. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 5:25 pm
In 2004, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals was the first federal appeals court to rule in favor of a transgender plaintiff, in Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Mc Curdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) the court granted Brian McCurdy’s petition against Respondent Princess Shreve McCurdy for immediate return of the couple's minor child, B.M., to Canada. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:36 am by Unknown
(Ken V Author- Criminal Law Forms by the American Bar Association)The NJ statute on expungement was revised in a law signed. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by National Indian Law Library
Town of Ledyard (property tax, lessors of slot machines)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmAdoptive Couple v. [read post]
Barring a dramatic development, such as a reversal by the United States Supreme Court, this decision should be of great concern to any entity that retained workers as independent contractors prior to Dynamex. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am by Hall Marston
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am by Hall Marston
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]