Search for: "State v. C. J. A."
Results 461 - 480
of 6,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
S. ___, ___ (2020) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in part) (slip op., at 4); see also, e.g., Kimble v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
State, (Idaho Law Review, Vol. 59, Forthcoming).Linda C. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
Timmons and Melissa J. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
But Art.1 states only Congress can borrow. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
C. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
Full text available online at http://www.sepeap.org/archivos/pdf/11191.pdf Janneke, C, et al. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 22 May 2023, Tipples J heard an application in QRT v JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am
Arrow and Anthony C. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Patrick J. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Patrick J. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
After the oral arguments in Twitter v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Some reimbursement payments were made from the Donald J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Last week in the courts On 15 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]