Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 461 - 480
of 15,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
James B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The need to keep a certain sign free for competitors is not an interest protected under Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR, but rather of other absolute grounds, such as Artt. 7(1)(c), (d) or (e) EUTMR. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In particular, Mr Justice Jay found that Canada Square’s continued non-disclosure of the excessive commission it received constituted a breach of duty and that this breach of duty was deliberate for the period between the CCA 1974, ss 140 A-C coming into force on 6 April 2007 and the end of the loan in March 2010. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
C. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
”(C) Service by Text Message. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” Heldebrandt v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Indeed, as also noted in Response Clothing [IPKat here], with specific regard to the category ‘works of artistic craftmanship’, ‘[c]omplete conformity with art.2 [of the InfoSoc Directive], in particular as interpreted by the CJEU in Cofemel, C-683/17 would exclude any requirement that the [claimant's fabric] has aesthetic appeal’.Third, having regard to the EU Member States, two points are worth raising: (a) those still going around… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
’s testimony, who the court called the most important witness, it stated: The judge determined A.H. was the most important witness. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Interpreting § 315(c) to allow joinder regardless of time limits renders § 315(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The decision then notes that Petitioner's remaining arguments on this point, to the extent not specifically addressed, had been examined and found to be "lacking in merit" by the Appellate Division.* RSSL §507-b(c) provides as follows: c. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The decision then notes that Petitioner's remaining arguments on this point, to the extent not specifically addressed, had been examined and found to be "lacking in merit" by the Appellate Division.* RSSL §507-b(c) provides as follows: c. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By Chris Holman Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
