Search for: "State v. Carbone"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
State, 469 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 (Indiana Supreme Court 1984) (referencing Nixon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:35 am
The dispute in Walsh v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:59 am
See Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:02 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).During oral arguments in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
See Hilton v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:03 am
Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:41 am
V. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
Summary of presentation: On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in American Electric Power, et al v Connecticut, et al (10-174) ("AEP"), a case filed by eight states, one city and three land trusts seeking an order requiring five of the nation's largest coal-fired power producers to reduce their emissions for at least a decade. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am
By Dennis Crouch Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:02 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
., v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Connecticut, the Court will consider whether states can use the tort theory of public nuisance to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:34 am
Industry officials and environmentalists said in interviews that the rule, which comes on the heels of tough new requirements that the Obama administration imposed on mercury emissions and cross-state pollution from utilities within the past year, dooms any proposal to build a coal-fired plant that does not have costly carbon controls. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court held in Whitman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am
The rule orders states to make big cuts in carbon dioxide emissions from power plants over the next 15 years, setting individual goals for each state while giving them considerable flexibility in how to get reach them. [read post]
