Search for: "State v. City of Austin"
Results 461 - 480
of 677
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
Section 5 applies throughout nine states, and to various county or city governments in seven other states. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
City of Pinehurst v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:16 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
| Canadian Lawyer Magazine – http://bit.ly/KWtyZT (Dara Nevin) When Litigation Hits, The First 7 to 10 Days is Critical – http://bit.ly/LigIC2 (Doug Austin) Who Can Get Your Tweets, and Can You Object? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
He was “convicted and appealed to the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach” which found him guilty after a bench trial and fined him $250. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
City of Boerne v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:21 pm
See City of Fort Worth, 22 S.W.3d at 846; Foreca, S.A. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:21 pm
See City of Fort Worth, 22 S.W.3d at 846; Foreca, S.A. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Three years ago, when the Supreme Court questioned the constitutionality of the 1965 law (in Northwest Austin Utility District v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:52 pm
In TXOGA and TIPRO v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
Davis, 100 S.W.2d 94, 95 (Tex. 1937); City of Austin v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:07 am
Tex. 2011) (citing Port City State Bank v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/INcG7c (Charles Skamser) eDiscovery Case Law: Defendant Responds to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal in Da Silva Moore – bit.ly/KnyPcm (Doug Austin) EDRM and Statistical Sampling - bit.ly/J8fKJ6 (Doug Austin) Email Admissibility: Double Hearsay Satisfied by (1) Business Record Incorporating (2) Admission – 801(d)(2)(B) Does Not Require Employee Have Ability to Bind Employer — Junior Status of Employee Goes to Weight –… [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
[Link] The Annual DRI Business Litigation and Intellectual Property Seminar will be held May 16-18, 2012, in New York City. [read post]
