Search for: "State v. City of Seattle"
Results 461 - 480
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Class 46) Member States simplify international design registration system (WIPO) (Class 99) Greece Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki: Trying to claim damages in Greece: RP ABEE ALL DAY vs ALL DAY (Class 46) India Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ Bill keeps stirring a hornet’s nest (Spicy IP) India’s Bayh Dole: A blind legal transplant? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
City of Seattle v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
City of Seattle v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services90 7th Street, Suite 4-100San Francisco, CA 94103Voice Phone (415)437-8310FAX (415)437-8329TDD (415)437-8311Region X - Seattle(Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington)Linda Yuu Connor, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
" Amchem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
City of Seattle, the court held at under the PRA (at RCW 42.56.280), a city does not have to release records related to union contract negotiations while those negotiations are ongoing. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
(See City of Tacoma v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:52 am
City of Seattle, Division I held that the City of Seattle did not have to treat an oral request made at a planning meeting as a PRA request because under the circumstances, there was no reason for the City to recognize that it was a PRA request. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
Kennedy's vote in Ricci v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
City of Seattle v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
In this sense, Hunter-Seattle is consistent with that other Hunter doctrine -- Hunter v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:48 pm
And that, my fellow readers, is basically how it went in City of Seattle v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:34 am
Ricci v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:46 pm
Thanks to everyone who came to “Meet the Bloggers V” tonight at Graham & Dunn on Seattle’s beautiful waterfront. [read post]
