Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 461 - 480 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm by Michael Lowe
” Read, “Senate passes bill opening door for prosecutors to charge fentanyl distributors with murder,” written by James Barragán and published in the Texas Tribune on March 15, 2023. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Without intermediaries, mass communication platforms such as the internet wouldn’t exist. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
Bureau negotiates settlement with Canadian Nivea distributor over performance claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm by Steve Szentesi
Bureau negotiates settlement with Canadian Nivea distributor over performance claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
Sales is a distributor of food products in the DC area. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by Clarence T.
  The statute goes on to say that a court may use any logically relevant factor to determine if what you have is paraphernalia, including the following: Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use; Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any controlled substance; The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Information not privileged (b) Information that is communicated to a physician in an effort to obtain a controlled dangerous substance in violation of this section is not a privileged communication. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
For example, our Advertising and Marketing Law casebook covers the FTC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am by Glenn
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:51 am
 Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 New Issued cases There were two new defamation cases issued in the Media and Communications List last week. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The actions against Singapore distributor Synnex Trading and retailer An-Nahl was brought under Section 136 (3A) of the Copyright Act. [read post]