Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 461 - 480
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
There is, however, no prohibition on the court considering conduct which pre or post-dates the complaint - Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary v Boorman [2005] EWHC 2559 (Admin); Stevens v South East Surrey Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 1456 (Admin); Birmingham City Council v Dixon [2009] EWHC 761 (Admin). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:26 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
The Employment Rights (Revision of Limits) Order 2009 states that the maximum award will decrease from its current £66,200 to £65,300 for all claims where the event giving rise to the claim occurred on or after 1st February 2010. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:40 am
" Although it may be that a "criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered" (People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:16 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston [2009] EWCA Civ 1298 (08 December 2009) Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [2009] EWCA Civ 1311 (08 December 2009) High Court (Administrative Division) Quila & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 3189 (Admin) (07 December 2009) Meredith & Ors v [...] [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
*Semple v Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates’ Court [2009] QBD [Statutory interpretation – absurd result if statute interpreted literally] D punched a police constable in the face. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:37 am
In Bell v Burson (402 U.S. 535) the Court acknowledged that the right to drive is a privilege. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v Information Commissioner, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening Court of Appeal “There could be no question of the retention of records of old minor convictions being held in the national police computer to be either excessive or being held for longer than necessary. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
A decision of the Court of Appeal that was not cited in Westminster was Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2003] EWHC 2971 (QB). [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil division) P (A Child), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 376 (08 May 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Ghai v Newcastle City Council [2009] EWHC 978 (Admin) (08 May 2009) Hobson v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 981 (Admin) (08 May 2009) Bates & Anor v Chief Constable of the Avon [...] [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run May 10, 2009. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
In the context of a recent reference to the European Court of Justice from the English Court (Case C-127/04, O’Byrne v Sanofi Pasteur MDS Limited and Sanofi Pasteur SA) Advocate-General Geelhoed stated in his opinion that “if the supplier is erroneously sued as the producer, he should immediately inform the suing party as to the identity of the producer… If he were to fail to do so, by analogy with Article 3(3) of the Directive he should be treated as… [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
In Kruska v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
A4235
Ortiz (MS) -- Lowers the per se intoxication level blood alcohol content to .06 percent blood alcohol content; repealer No Same asBLURB : V & T L. lower BAC levels Last Act: 03/11/09 enacting clause strickenA4516A
Weinstein (MS) -- Relates to the accrual of merit time by certain inmates No Same asBLURB : Cor. merit time allowances Last Act: 03/11/09 amend and recommit to correction03/11/09 print number 4516aA6664
Hooper --… [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:49 am
The opinion in State v. [read post]
