Search for: "State v. David Harding"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm
The opinion is today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford Law School, has posted two papers on the history of class actions. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:21 am
That will be hard to prove, of course, but why does it matter? [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:51 pm
[The opinion was written by prominent conservative Judge David Sentelle.] [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
It’s a little hard to tell when the case will end in District Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:47 am
For example, in a 1969 case, Watts v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
In Doggett v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:19 am
In the meantime, David Bier is right to suggest that Congress should take a hard look at what is going on, and pass legislation overriding at least the worst abuses of the travel ban policy. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
On the surface, there seems to be no hard feelings about the hierarchy arrangement. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:49 am
State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Mayo Holding Co., Minnesota District Judge David S. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm
” 37 C.F.R. 202.1(a); Planesi v. [read post]