Search for: "State v. Flowers" Results 461 - 480 of 841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
An infantile child prank becomes a felony charge for the perpetrator.Last year, Justice Scalia noted in in his partial concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-7553, Flowers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6289 Flowers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6289 Flowers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6289 Flowers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by Daniel Nazer
” Patent claims like these are almost surely invalid under the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
The US typically has four levels of jurisdiction Federal, State, county and local. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Her retaliation claim based on her alleged social isolation at work after complaining about the harassment also survived (Flowers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:12 am by Walter Olson
Cato files an amicus brief backing a Richland, Wash. florist’s right not to say it with flowers [Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber, brief in State of Washington v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:36 pm by S2KM Limited
Submitting an amici curiae brief (jointly with the Special Needs Alliance and National Housing Law Project) in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit case of Kimberly DeCambre v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]