Search for: "State v. General Chemical Corp."
Results 461 - 480
of 522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
AMVAC Chemical Corp., 2008 WL 4691004, at *5 (C.D.Cal. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
However, in 2007, the Supreme Court indicated in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See generally Sinclair v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), the Supreme Court held that an entity who fraudulently obtains a patent and then uses that patent to exclude a competitor from the market is not immune from antitrust liability under Noerr-Pennington. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), the Supreme Court held that an entity who fraudulently obtains a patent and then uses that patent to exclude a competitor from the market is not immune from antitrust liability under Noerr-Pennington. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:13 pm
Co. v United States Fid. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), but these types of claims can be made under state antitrust laws, per Associated General Contractors v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board ........ [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 2:55 pm
ExxonMobil Corp. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:13 pm
Comiskey, 499 F.3d at 1373; AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:31 pm
In General Foods Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:38 pm
In Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Henry v Dow Chemical, 473 Mich 63 (2006). [read post]
