Search for: "State v. J. B."
Results 461 - 480
of 6,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Alex Touchet & Bradley J, Lingo, Failure to Accommodate: Assessing the Legacy of Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
Timmons and Melissa J. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Land, and Ryan J. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Land, and Ryan J. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
Sections 33, 34 and 35(b): Charity mergers. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
§§ 9003(b), 9002(5). [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:19 am
Notably, the Court acknowledged that the state gets to legislate property rights, “[b]ut state law cannot be the only source. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 7:37 am
Scott J. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Some reimbursement payments were made from the Donald J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Dalgleish v Dalgleish, [2001] O.J. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:59 am
But, nonetheless, on May 3, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Traffic Jam Events LLC v. [read post]
