Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:21 am
The claim pursuant to the Judiciary Law § 487 must also be dismissed, as the alleged deceit did not occur during a pending judicial proceeding (see Jacobs v Kay, 50 AD3d 526, 527 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
In Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 8:37 am
Plaintiff sues Reid in New York federal court.The case is La Liberta v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
State ex. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick breaks down the new “Lawful Prospective Immigrant Status” category proposed by the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in State of New York, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:55 am
So it's always news when the Second Circuit rules that a conviction was in fact unconstitutional, which is what happened here in this homicide case.The case is Orlando v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 10:24 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has answered that question with a resounding “No, but…” In Chevalier v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
State ex rel. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:37 am
Jacobs previews tomorrow’s oral arguments in Yates v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
" That case is Powell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
Ralls challenged the final order issued by CFIUS (CFIUS Order) and the Presidential Order in district court, alleging, inter alia, that the orders violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because neither CFIUS nor the President (collectively, with Treasury Secretary and CFIUS Chairman Jacob Lew, Appellees) provided Ralls the opportunity to review and rebut the evidence upon which they relied. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 11:04 am
Shands v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
In Jacobs Project Management Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
Court of Federal Claims' (“COFC”) decision in Jacobs Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
