Search for: "State v. Jean"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2018, 1:18 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for first degree murder in Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 1:18 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for first degree murder in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
EU calls for radical copyright reform in light of internet's disruption http://t.co/Sb03kkzzXm via @V3_co_uk -> The Problem with the Aereo Dissent http://t.co/V3ehYt01Vc -> The United States Supreme Court endorses digital privacy in a landmark decision http://t.co/KGxH3Zu3YP -> The Supreme Court Considers Google Street View http://t.co/vfw3LQLjF7 -> New guidelines on data ownership and liability could be issued to address 'internet of things' phenomenon… [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:52 am
The claim must be pleaded with particularity and allege “intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit” (Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [2018]). [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
Decisions Arbitrator Jean Ménard allowed the grievance. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
Decisions Arbitrator Jean Ménard allowed the grievance. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
Decisions Arbitrator Jean Ménard allowed the grievance. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
” [But read below] “Second Counterclaim: Judiciary Law § 487 To state a cause of action for violation of Judiciary Law § 487, a party must plead intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit (Judiciary Law§ 487; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
Plaintiffs, however, failed to sufficiently plead how the concealment of this relationship caused plaintiffs any damages or led to any adverse rulings in the divorce action (see Saporito v Branda, 213 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2023]; DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 776 [2d Dept 2020]; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]; cf. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:18 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
McCutcheon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
As a result, using some so-called western standard, in fact universal standards, to measure China, or even the United States, is appropriate. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:02 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:37 pm
Atticus' critique of Brown v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
To that end, Flora Sapio, Jean Mittelstaedt and I thought it might be worthwhile to add very brief reflections on this essay. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:39 pm
Prochilo and People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 6:08 am
The case was more notable -- at least from a trademark standpoint -- for what it DIDN'T discuss, rather than what it did discuss.The 3d Circuit's decision in Jean Alexander Cosmetics v. [read post]
